Studied for
4 endpoints · 6 findings · 3 papers
- Total cholesterol (TC)lowersEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- TriglycerideslowersEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- Serum adiponectinraisesEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- LDL cholesterollowersEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.
What the evidence says
How to read these marks6 findings · 4 endpoints · 3 papers · by evidence strength
What moved
6 findings
Decreases triglycerides
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×1“The average of differences for triglycerides until 5 years was significantly reduced with 10 mg daily of pravastatin(P=0.023).”
Quoted verbatim from Long-Term Effect of Pravastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Complex Thickness: The J-STARS Echo Study (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke).. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- 10 mg daily
- Population
- Japanese patients aged 45-80 with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke and serum total cholesterol 180-240 mg/dL without statins, pravastatin 10 mg daily versus no statin (open-label); J-STARS Echo substudy
Long-Term Effect of Pravastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Complex Thickness: The J-STARS Echo Study (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke).2018PMID:29191850Permalink
Decreases total cholesterol (TC)
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×1“Total cholesterol and LDLC were significantly reduced with 10 mg daily of pravastatin by 12% and 19%, respectively, at the 1-year follow-up and continuously thereafter.”
Quoted verbatim from Long-Term Effect of Pravastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Complex Thickness: The J-STARS Echo Study (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke).. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- 10 mg daily
- Population
- Japanese patients aged 45-80 with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke and serum total cholesterol 180-240 mg/dL without statins, pravastatin 10 mg daily versus no statin (open-label); J-STARS Echo substudy
Long-Term Effect of Pravastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Complex Thickness: The J-STARS Echo Study (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke).2018PMID:29191850Permalink
Increases serum adiponectin
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Finding“By pooling the results of the nine included comparisons, our meta-analysis showed that pravastatin treatment was associated with a significant increased level of circulating adiponectin as compared with controls (WMD =0.63 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.17–1.09 µg/mL; P=0.007; Figure 2A), with moderate heterogeneity among the included studies (P for Cochrane’s Q test =0.20, I =28%).”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of pravastatin treatment on circulating adiponectin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Eight randomized controlled trials (nine comparisons) of patients with various disease statuses (hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease), pravastatin versus control; total adiponectin measured by ELISA or radioimmunoassay
Effect 0.63 mean difference, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.09
Effect of pravastatin treatment on circulating adiponectin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2019PMID:31190742Permalink
Decreases total cholesterol (TC)
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Findingreplicated ×1“Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%.”
Quoted verbatim from Pravastatin for lowering lipids.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
- Population
- Participants of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, in randomized placebo-controlled trials of fixed pravastatin doses lasting three to 12 weeks; dose range 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.2023PMID:37721222Permalink
Decreases LDL cholesterol
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%.”
Quoted verbatim from Pravastatin for lowering lipids.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
- Population
- Participants of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, in randomized placebo-controlled trials of fixed pravastatin doses lasting three to 12 weeks; dose range 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.2023PMID:37721222Permalink
Decreases triglycerides
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Findingreplicated ×1“Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%.”
Quoted verbatim from Pravastatin for lowering lipids.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
- Population
- Participants of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, in randomized placebo-controlled trials of fixed pravastatin doses lasting three to 12 weeks; dose range 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.2023PMID:37721222Permalink
Papers screened
505 papers
- Compound
- pravastatin
- Screened
- 505
- Admitted
- 3
- Discarded
- 9
- Not read
- 493
- Showing
- 200 of 505
Produced a finding3 papers
- PMID:291918502026-10-05
- PMID:311907422026-10-05
- PMID:377212222026-10-05
Discarded: an endpoint this vocabulary does not hold4 papers
- PMID:17325332no claim extracted — no_outcome_node — measured: all-site cancer incidence, pooled risk ratio from randomized trials2026-10-05
- PMID:30251369no claim extracted — endpoint_near_miss — measured: restricted mean survival time difference in days over 6 years (all-cause survival time), reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves; not a death proportion or hazard | restricted mean survival time difference in days over a fixed horizon, not an all-cause mortality proportion or hazard2026-10-05
- PMID:31292301no claim extracted — no_outcome_node — measured: plasma lipidomic species and lipid-ratio change at 1 year by mass spectrometry lipidomics; mediation of cardiovascular relative risk reduction | plasma lipidomic species change (mass spectrometry lipidomics) and lipid-ratio mediation of relative risk reduction2026-10-05
- PMID:41808442no claim extracted — no_outcome_node — measured: endothelium-dependent relaxation of isolated human uterine radial artery, pressure myography, bradykinin concentration-response | endothelium-dependent relaxation of isolated human arteries, pressure myography, percentage relaxation to bradykinin2026-10-05
Discarded: another reason, stated per paper3 papers
- PMID:31715077no claim extracted — cause not determined (one pass only) — measured: maternal plasma soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), BRAHMS Kryptor immunoassay, mean over days 1-3 after randomisation2026-10-05
- PMID:34033812no claim extracted — cause not determined (one pass only) — measured: preeclampsia incidence in high-risk pregnancy, ACOG criteria confirmed by blinded panel2026-10-05
- PMID:40461956no claim extracted — cause not determined (one pass only) — measured: vertebral artery dissection morphologic improvement or resolution on vessel wall MRI, dichotomised improved/resolved versus aggravated/stationary2026-10-05
Discarded: no comparator1 paper
- PMID:31477152no claim extracted — comparator_not_absence2026-10-05
Discarded: the wrong population1 paper
- PMID:28924103no claim extracted — result_is_subgroup_only2026-10-05
Not read yet493 papers
- PMID:103854582026-09-29
- PMID:103873862026-09-29
- PMID:104889702026-09-29
- PMID:111302182026-09-29
- PMID:111731822026-09-29
- PMID:114041652026-09-29
- PMID:114265882026-09-29
- PMID:115718162026-09-29
- PMID:117399792026-09-29
- PMID:119224002026-09-29
- PMID:120212182026-09-29
- PMID:120285072026-09-29
and 481 more.
Measured, not recorded
- Compound
- pravastatin
- Endpoints measured
- 254 endpoints
- Recorded as a finding
- No
Show what was measured
cancer risk modification by participant age (meta-regression)
increases, p = 0.006
the age of study participants significantly modified the effect of pravastatin therapy on cancer risk (p = 0.006)
PMID:17325332 · one of two readings recorded this
cancer risk
no effect, n = 42902
fixed-effects (risk ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.13)
PMID:17325332 · one of two readings recorded this
cancer risk
no effect, n = 42902
random-effects model (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.14)
PMID:17325332 · one of two readings recorded this
all strokes, adjusted HR
no effect
All Strokes, HR (95%CI) | 0.96 (0.64–1.43) | 0.95 (0.61–1.48)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
all strokes, adjusted HR
no effect
All Strokes, HR (95%CI) | 0.96 (0.64–1.43) | 0.95 (0.61–1.48)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
all strokes, n (%) of patients
All Strokes, n (%) | 47 (11.0) | 38 (10.4) | 49 (11.8) | 41 (11.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
all strokes, n (%) of patients
All Strokes, n (%) | 47 (11.0) | 38 (10.4) | 49 (11.8) | 41 (11.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic infarction, n (%) of patients
Atherothrombotic infarction, n (%) | 5 (1.2) | 3 (0.8) | 18 (4.3) | 7 (1.9)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic infarction, n (%) of patients
Atherothrombotic infarction, n (%) | 5 (1.2) | 3 (0.8) | 18 (4.3) | 7 (1.9)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic stroke, incidence and adjusted HR
decreases, p = 0.011
(Fig. 1B; 0.24 vs. 0.88%/year, p = 0.011, adjusted HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.80])
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic stroke, incidence and adjusted HR
no effect, p = 0.29
(Fig. 2B; 0.17 vs. 0.39%/year, p = 0.29, adjusted HR 0.49 [95% CI 0.13 to 1.90])
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic stroke incidence, early vs late cohort
decreases, p = 0.049
The incidence of atherothrombotic stroke was significantly higher in the early cohort compared with the late cohort among control patients (0.88 vs. 0.39%/year, p = 0.049)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
cardioembolic infarction, adjusted HR
no effect
Cardioembolic infarction, HR (95%CI) | 5.26 (0.61–45.06) | 1.00 (0.14–7.08)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
cardioembolic infarction, adjusted HR
no effect
Cardioembolic infarction, HR (95%CI) | 5.26 (0.61–45.06) | 1.00 (0.14–7.08)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
cardioembolic infarction, n (%) of patients
Cardioembolic infarction, n (%) | 5 (1.2) | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
cardioembolic infarction, n (%) of patients
Cardioembolic infarction, n (%) | 5 (1.2) | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
death, n (%) of patients
Death, n (%) | 24 (5.6) | 19 (5.2) | 19 (4.6) | 16 (4.3)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
death, n (%) of patients
Death, n (%) | 24 (5.6) | 19 (5.2) | 19 (4.6) | 16 (4.3)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization, n (%) of patients
Hospitalization, n (%) | 128 (30.0) | 107 (29.2) | 113 (27.1) | 119 (32.3)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization, n (%) of patients
Hospitalization, n (%) | 128 (30.0) | 107 (29.2) | 113 (27.1) | 119 (32.3)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of all strokes per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 2.40 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 2.41
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of all strokes per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 2.40 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 2.41
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of atherothrombotic stroke, and of stroke plus TIA, pravastatin 10 mg/day versus no statin, reported only separately for patients enrolled within 6 months and later than 6 months after the initial stroke (post-hoc analysis of J-STARS)
decreases, p = 0.011
Not recorded as a finding: every result is a subgroup, with no whole-population estimate
By contrast, the incidence of atherothrombotic stroke was significantly lower in the pravastatin group compared with the control group among patients in the early cohort, (Fig. 1B; 0.24 vs. 0.88%/year, p = 0.011, adjusted HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.80]).
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of cardioembolic infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.11
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of cardioembolic infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.11
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of death per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 1.14 | 1.08 | 0.92 | 0.89
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of death per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 1.14 | 1.08 | 0.92 | 0.89
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of hospitalization per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 7.38 | 7.30 | 6.55 | 7.84
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of hospitalization per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 7.38 | 7.30 | 6.55 | 7.84
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of intracranial hemorrhage per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.22
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of intracranial hemorrhage per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.22
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of lacunar infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 1.29 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 1.03
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of lacunar infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 1.29 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 1.03
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of myocardial infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.28
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of myocardial infarction per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.28
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of stroke and TIA per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 2.74 | 2.36 | 2.70 | 2.60
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of stroke and TIA per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 2.74 | 2.36 | 2.70 | 2.60
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of TIA per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.22
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of TIA per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.22
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of vascular accidents per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 3.37 | 3.01 | 3.58 | 3.95
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of vascular accidents per 100 person-year
Incidence, 100 person-year | 3.37 | 3.01 | 3.58 | 3.95
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
interaction of pravastatin effect on atherothrombotic stroke by early vs late cohort
no effect, p = 0.59
this difference of pravastatin effect on atherothrombotic stroke was not significantly interacted by the early or late cohort (p = 0.59)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage, adjusted HR
no effect
Intracranial hemorrhage, HR (95%CI) | 0.73 (0.25–2.11) | 1.53 (0.43–5.44)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage, adjusted HR
no effect
Intracranial hemorrhage, HR (95%CI) | 0.73 (0.25–2.11) | 1.53 (0.43–5.44)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage, n (%) of patients
Intracranial hemorrhage, n (%) | 6 (1.4) | 6 (1.6) | 8 (1.9) | 4 (1.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage, n (%) of patients
Intracranial hemorrhage, n (%) | 6 (1.4) | 6 (1.6) | 8 (1.9) | 4 (1.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
lacunar infarction, adjusted HR
no effect
Lacunar infarction, HR (95%CI) | 1.28 (0.72–2.30) | 1.17 (0.62–2.20)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
lacunar infarction, adjusted HR
no effect
Lacunar infarction, HR (95%CI) | 1.28 (0.72–2.30) | 1.17 (0.62–2.20)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
lacunar infarction, n (%) of patients
Lacunar infarction, n (%) | 26 (6.1) | 21 (5.7) | 20 (4.8) | 18 (4.9)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
lacunar infarction, n (%) of patients
Lacunar infarction, n (%) | 26 (6.1) | 21 (5.7) | 20 (4.8) | 18 (4.9)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
myocardial infarction, n (%) of patients
Myocardial infarction, n (%) | 3 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.5) | 5 (1.4)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
myocardial infarction, n (%) of patients
Myocardial infarction, n (%) | 3 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.5) | 5 (1.4)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke and TIA, incidence and adjusted HR
no effect, p = 0.92
(Fig. 1A; 2.74 vs. 2.70%/year, p = 0.92, adjusted HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.70 to 1.50])
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke and TIA, incidence and adjusted HR
no effect, p = 0.64
(Fig. 1A; 2.36 vs. 2.60%/year, p = 0.64, adjusted HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.59 to 1.39])
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke and TIA incidence, early vs late cohort
no effect, p = 0.42
The incidence of stroke and TIA was similar in the early cohort and in the late cohort (2.48 vs. 2.78%/year, p = 0.42)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke and TIA, n (%) of patients
Stroke and TIA, n (%) | 53 (12.4) | 39 (10.6) | 52 (12.5) | 44 (12.0)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke and TIA, n (%) of patients
Stroke and TIA, n (%) | 53 (12.4) | 39 (10.6) | 52 (12.5) | 44 (12.0)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
TIA, adjusted HR
no effect
TIA, HR (95%CI) | 1.41 (0.42–5.21) | 0.51 (0.09–2.79)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
TIA, adjusted HR
no effect
TIA, HR (95%CI) | 1.41 (0.42–5.21) | 0.51 (0.09–2.79)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
TIA, n (%) of patients
TIA, n (%) | 6 (1.4) | 2 (0.5) | 4 (1.0) | 4 (1.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
TIA, n (%) of patients
TIA, n (%) | 6 (1.4) | 2 (0.5) | 4 (1.0) | 4 (1.1)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
vascular accidents, n (%) of patients
Vascular accidents, n (%) | 64 (15.0) | 49 (13.4) | 67 (16.1) | 65 (17.7)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
vascular accidents, n (%) of patients
Vascular accidents, n (%) | 64 (15.0) | 49 (13.4) | 67 (16.1) | 65 (17.7)
PMID:28924103 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol
no effect
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not significantly different between the 2 groups
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.62
0.012±0.188, 0.010±0.270, 0.015±0.275, −0.005±0.265, and 0.014±0.252 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.006±0.148 mm (P=0.62), 0.018±0.184 mm (P=0.27), 0.020±0.189 mm (P=0.30), 0.034±0.236 mm (P=0.040), and 0.044±0.300 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.27
0.012±0.188, 0.010±0.270, 0.015±0.275, −0.005±0.265, and 0.014±0.252 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.006±0.148 mm (P=0.62), 0.018±0.184 mm (P=0.27), 0.020±0.189 mm (P=0.30), 0.034±0.236 mm (P=0.040), and 0.044±0.300 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.3
0.012±0.188, 0.010±0.270, 0.015±0.275, −0.005±0.265, and 0.014±0.252 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.006±0.148 mm (P=0.62), 0.018±0.184 mm (P=0.27), 0.020±0.189 mm (P=0.30), 0.034±0.236 mm (P=0.040), and 0.044±0.300 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
decreases, p = 0.04
0.012±0.188, 0.010±0.270, 0.015±0.275, −0.005±0.265, and 0.014±0.252 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.006±0.148 mm (P=0.62), 0.018±0.184 mm (P=0.27), 0.020±0.189 mm (P=0.30), 0.034±0.236 mm (P=0.040), and 0.044±0.300 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.4
0.012±0.188, 0.010±0.270, 0.015±0.275, −0.005±0.265, and 0.014±0.252 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.006±0.148 mm (P=0.62), 0.018±0.184 mm (P=0.27), 0.020±0.189 mm (P=0.30), 0.034±0.236 mm (P=0.040), and 0.044±0.300 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.78
0.017±0.190, 0.016±0.225, 0.017±0.263, 0.002±0.251, and 0.017±0.246 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.148 mm (P=0.78), 0.022±0.186 mm (P=0.26), 0.022±0.190 mm (P=0.45), 0.045±0.248 mm (P=0.043), and 0.051±0.313 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.26
0.017±0.190, 0.016±0.225, 0.017±0.263, 0.002±0.251, and 0.017±0.246 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.148 mm (P=0.78), 0.022±0.186 mm (P=0.26), 0.022±0.190 mm (P=0.45), 0.045±0.248 mm (P=0.043), and 0.051±0.313 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.45
0.017±0.190, 0.016±0.225, 0.017±0.263, 0.002±0.251, and 0.017±0.246 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.148 mm (P=0.78), 0.022±0.186 mm (P=0.26), 0.022±0.190 mm (P=0.45), 0.045±0.248 mm (P=0.043), and 0.051±0.313 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
decreases, p = 0.043
0.017±0.190, 0.016±0.225, 0.017±0.263, 0.002±0.251, and 0.017±0.246 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.148 mm (P=0.78), 0.022±0.186 mm (P=0.26), 0.022±0.190 mm (P=0.45), 0.045±0.248 mm (P=0.043), and 0.051±0.313 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in maximum IMT
no effect, p = 0.4
0.017±0.190, 0.016±0.225, 0.017±0.263, 0.002±0.251, and 0.017±0.246 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.148 mm (P=0.78), 0.022±0.186 mm (P=0.26), 0.022±0.190 mm (P=0.45), 0.045±0.248 mm (P=0.043), and 0.051±0.313 mm (P=0.40)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.74
0.011±0.085, 0.023±0.114, 0.017±0.114, 0.018±0.118, and 0.021±0.116 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.074 mm (P=0.74), 0.020±0.087 mm (P=0.99), 0.017±0.097 mm (P=0.44), 0.030±0.113 mm (P=0.18), and 0.040±0.118 mm (P=0.010)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.99
0.011±0.085, 0.023±0.114, 0.017±0.114, 0.018±0.118, and 0.021±0.116 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.074 mm (P=0.74), 0.020±0.087 mm (P=0.99), 0.017±0.097 mm (P=0.44), 0.030±0.113 mm (P=0.18), and 0.040±0.118 mm (P=0.010)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.44
0.011±0.085, 0.023±0.114, 0.017±0.114, 0.018±0.118, and 0.021±0.116 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.074 mm (P=0.74), 0.020±0.087 mm (P=0.99), 0.017±0.097 mm (P=0.44), 0.030±0.113 mm (P=0.18), and 0.040±0.118 mm (P=0.010)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.18
0.011±0.085, 0.023±0.114, 0.017±0.114, 0.018±0.118, and 0.021±0.116 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.074 mm (P=0.74), 0.020±0.087 mm (P=0.99), 0.017±0.097 mm (P=0.44), 0.030±0.113 mm (P=0.18), and 0.040±0.118 mm (P=0.010)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
decreases, p = 0.01
0.011±0.085, 0.023±0.114, 0.017±0.114, 0.018±0.118, and 0.021±0.116 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.008±0.074 mm (P=0.74), 0.020±0.087 mm (P=0.99), 0.017±0.097 mm (P=0.44), 0.030±0.113 mm (P=0.18), and 0.040±0.118 mm (P=0.010)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.69
0.012±0.084, 0.024±0.101, 0.018±0.108, 0.019±0.115, and 0.022±0.108 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.010±0.075 mm (P=0.69), 0.021±0.088 mm (P=0.89), 0.020±0.097 mm (P=0.49), 0.035±0.1138 mm (P=0.15), and 0.044±0.123 mm (P=0.016)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.89
0.012±0.084, 0.024±0.101, 0.018±0.108, 0.019±0.115, and 0.022±0.108 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.010±0.075 mm (P=0.69), 0.021±0.088 mm (P=0.89), 0.020±0.097 mm (P=0.49), 0.035±0.1138 mm (P=0.15), and 0.044±0.123 mm (P=0.016)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.49
0.012±0.084, 0.024±0.101, 0.018±0.108, 0.019±0.115, and 0.022±0.108 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.010±0.075 mm (P=0.69), 0.021±0.088 mm (P=0.89), 0.020±0.097 mm (P=0.49), 0.035±0.1138 mm (P=0.15), and 0.044±0.123 mm (P=0.016)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
no effect, p = 0.15
0.012±0.084, 0.024±0.101, 0.018±0.108, 0.019±0.115, and 0.022±0.108 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.010±0.075 mm (P=0.69), 0.021±0.088 mm (P=0.89), 0.020±0.097 mm (P=0.49), 0.035±0.1138 mm (P=0.15), and 0.044±0.123 mm (P=0.016)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
annual change in mean IMT
decreases, p = 0.016
0.012±0.084, 0.024±0.101, 0.018±0.108, 0.019±0.115, and 0.022±0.108 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.010±0.075 mm (P=0.69), 0.021±0.088 mm (P=0.89), 0.020±0.097 mm (P=0.49), 0.035±0.1138 mm (P=0.15), and 0.044±0.123 mm (P=0.016)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
atherothrombotic infarction recurrence
unclear
atherothrombotic infarction tended to occur less frequently in the pravastatin group than in the control group (0.27 versus 0.71%/y; adjusted HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15–1.15
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
baseline maximum IMT of the common carotid artery
no effect, p = 0.56
Baseline maximum IMT (max IMT) was 1.195±0.331 mm in the pravastatin group and 1.182±0.314 mm in the control group (P=0.56)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
baseline mean IMT of the common carotid artery
no effect, p = 0.99
Baseline mean IMT (mean±SD) was 0.887±0.155 mm in the pravastatin group and 0.887±0.152 mm in the control group (P=0.99)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol, between-group over 5 years
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence is agentless and never names pravastatin, so it does not support the claim alone
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not significantly different between the 2 groups.
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke recurrence
no effect
ischemic stroke (2.09 versus 2.33%/y; adjusted HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.59–1.42)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
lacunar infarction recurrence
no effect
lacunar infarction (1.20 versus 1.14%/y; adjusted HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.59–1.93)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol reduction
decreases
Total cholesterol and LDLC were significantly reduced with 10 mg daily of pravastatin by 12% and 19%, respectively, at the 1-year follow-up and continuously thereafter
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol reduction
decreases
Total cholesterol and LDLC were significantly reduced with 10 mg daily of pravastatin by 12% and 19%, respectively, at the 1-year follow-up and continuously thereafter
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
total stroke and transient ischemic attack recurrence
no effect
total stroke and transient ischemic attack (2.58 versus 2.89%/y; adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61–1.35)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
total stroke recurrence
no effect
total stroke (2.27 versus 2.66%/y; adjusted HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.58–1.33)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides, average of differences
decreases, p = 0.023
The average of differences for triglycerides until 5 years was significantly reduced with 10 mg daily of pravastatin(P=0.023)
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
use of antihyperlipidemic drugs other than statin
Of these, 28 (7.2%) and 40 (9.9%) patients, respectively, received antihyperlipidemic drugs except statin
PMID:29191850 · one of two readings recorded this
10-year projected CHD-free restricted mean survival time difference
increases
the treated individuals gain 77.9 days (95% CI, 3.8 to 159.6) of CHD-free survival
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
10-year projected restricted mean survival time difference (all-cause)
decreases
The 10-year RMST difference estimated from parametric models showed that pravastatin-treated individuals live 108.1 days shorter (95% CI, −204.5 to −14.1)
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
6-year CHD-free restricted mean survival time
no effect, p = 0.209
The 6-year CHD-free mean survival time was longer by 18.7 days (95% CI, −10.4 to 47.8) in those assigned to pravastatin than in usual-care patients (2088.1 vs 2069.4 days), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.209)
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
6-year restricted mean survival time (all-cause mortality)
decreases, p = 0.047
Over 6 years, individuals who were randomized to pravastatin lived, on average, 2008.1 days; this was statistically significantly shorter by 33.7 days (95% CI, −67.0 to −0.5; p=0.047)
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
6-year restricted mean survival time (all-cause mortality)
than usual-care patients who lived, on average, 2041.8 days
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
6-year restricted mean survival time (days alive) for all-cause mortality and CHD-free restricted mean survival time, pravastatin 40 mg daily versus usual care, reconstructed from published ALLHAT-LLT survival curves
decreases, difference -33.7 days (95% CI -67.0 to -0.5) in 6-year restricted mean survival time, p = 0.047
Not recorded as a finding: a node exists but the paper states a different instrument or population
Over 6 years, individuals who were randomized to pravastatin lived, on average, 2008.1 days; this was statistically significantly shorter by 33.7 days (95% CI, −67.0 to −0.5; p=0.047) than usual-care patients who lived, on average, 2041.8 days (Table and Figure Panel A).
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
6-year restricted mean survival time (days of survival) and CHD-free restricted mean survival time, pravastatin 40 mg/d versus usual care, reconstructed from published ALLHAT-LLT survival curves in adults aged 65 and older
decreases, difference -33.7 days (95% CI -67.0 to -0.5) in all-cause survival time over 6 years, p = 0.047
Not recorded as a finding: a node exists but the paper states a different instrument or population
Over 6 years, individuals who were randomized to pravastatin lived, on average, 2008.1 days; this was statistically significantly shorter by 33.7 days (95% CI, −67.0 to −0.5; p=0.047) than usual-care patients who lived, on average, 2041.8 days (Table and Figure Panel A).
PMID:30251369 · one of two readings recorded this
adiponectin effect by proportion of male participants (meta-regression)
increases, p = 0.03
coefficient: 0.015, P=0.03
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin by disease status (MetS/IGT/DM vs hyperlipidemic/hypercholesterolemic)
no effect, p = 0.49
P for subgroup difference =0.49
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin, double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs only (sensitivity subset)
increases, WMD 0.82 µg/mL; 95% CI 0.17-1.47, p = 0.01
Not recorded as a finding: Subset analysis of the same endpoint; whole-population estimate recorded instead
Subsequent analyses by including four comparisons from RCTs of DB and PC design further confirmed the results, which showed an even larger increment of circulating adiponectin after pravastatin treatment (WMD =0.82 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.17–1.47 µg/mL; P=0.01; Figure 2B) with considerable heterogeneity (I =62%).
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
increases, p = 0.007, n = 595
WMD =0.63 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.17–1.09 µg/mL; P=0.007
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
increases, p = 0.01
WMD =0.82 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.17–1.47 µg/mL; P=0.01
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
no effect, p = 0.31
WMD =0.27 µg/mL; 95% CI, −0.26–0.80 µg/mL; I =0%; P=0.31
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
no effect, p = 0.94
WMD =−0.04 µg/mL; 95% CI, −1.01 to 0.93 µg/mL; P=0.94
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
increases, p = 0.008
WMD =1.41 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.58–2.23 µg/mL; P=0.008
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
circulating adiponectin
increases, p = 0.001
WMD =1.01 µg/mL; 95% CI, 0.43–1.59 µg/mL; P<0.001
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
publication bias (Egger test) for adiponectin effect
no effect, p = 0.47
No significant publication biases were indicated by the funnel plot or the results of Egger’s significance test for the effect of pravastatin on circulating adiponectin (P=0.47)
PMID:31190742 · one of two readings recorded this
benefit of pravastatin on cardiovascular events by quartile of change in PI(36:2)/PC(38:4)
no effect
Stratification of patients into quartiles of change in PI(36:2)/PC(38:4) indicated no benefit of pravastatin in the fourth quartile
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
change in 342 plasma lipid species between baseline and 1 year in a LIPID trial subcohort, linear regression on pravastatin treatment, and mediation of cardiovascular event risk reduction by the PI(36:2)/PC(38:4) ratio
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
Pravastatin treatment was associated with changes in 206 lipids.
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
number of plasma lipids associated with pravastatin treatment
modulates, n = 342
Pravastatin treatment was associated with changes in 206 lipids
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
proportion of treatment effect mediated by change in PI(36:2)/PC(38:4)
unclear
Change in PI(36:2)/PC(38:4) mediated 58% of the treatment effect
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
relative risk reduction (RRR) for cardiovascular events
decreases
The RRR from pravastatin treatment for cardiovascular events decreased from 23.5% to 16.6% after adjustment for clinical risk factors and change in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C)
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
relative risk reduction (RRR) for cardiovascular events
decreases
and to 3.0% after further adjustment for the change in the lipid ratio PI(36:2)/PC(38:4)
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
relative risk reduction (RRR) for cardiovascular events
decreases
The RRR from pravastatin treatment for cardiovascular events decreased from 23.5% to 16.6%
PMID:31292301 · one of two readings recorded this
serum HDL cholesterol (median)
Baseline | 8 | 54 (30, 83) | 6 | 61 (46, 87) | 7 | 61 (33, 82)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum HDL cholesterol (median)
Week 2 | 6 | 64 (34, 79) | 5 | 64 (51, 82) | 5 | 60 (36, 75)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum HDL cholesterol (median)
Week 4 | 3 | 40 (38, 62) | 4 | 60 (47, 72) | 3 | 59 (32, 60)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum hsCRP by immunoturbidimetric assay and LDL cholesterol by homogeneous enzymatic colorimetric assay, medians at baseline, week 2 and week 4 in an open-label three-arm pilot (aspirin 162 mg, pravastatin 40 mg, or both); no untreated or placebo arm
decreases
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
In the pravastatin and combined groups, median LDL cholesterol decreased between baseline and week 2, then rose slightly between weeks 2 and 4.
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum hsCRP decrease from baseline to week 2
decreases
hsCRP levels decreased from baseline to week 2 in 2 of 3 women in the aspirin group, 4 of 4 women in the pravastatin group, and 2 of 2 women in the combined group
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum hsCRP (median)
Baseline | 8 | 2.1 (0.2, 4.9) | 7 | 3.3 (0.4, 8.8) | 6 | 3.6 (0.3, 12.0)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum hsCRP (median)
decreases
Week 2 | 7 | 1.0 (0.2, 4.2) | 7 | 2.9 (0.3, 5.1) | 5 | 1.4 (0.3, 16.2)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum hsCRP (median)
decreases
Week 4 | 3 | 2.3 (0.8, 4.0) | 4 | 1.1 (0.6, 4.5) | 4 | 0.9 (0.3, 11.1)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-1 (median)
Baseline | 8 | 3.9 (3.9, 3.9) | 7 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0) | 7 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-1 (median)
no effect
Week 2 | 7 | 3.9 (3.9, 3.9) | 7 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0) | 5 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-1 (median)
no effect
Week 4 | 3 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0) | 4 | 4.0 (3.9, 4.0) | 4 | 3.9 (3.9, 4.0)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-6 (median)
Baseline | 8 | 1.9 (0.7, 3.0) | 7 | 3.4 (0.7, 41.1) | 6 | 3.2 (0.7, 15.4)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-6 (median)
Week 2 | 7 | 2.0 (0.7, 3.1) | 7 | 3.4 (0.7, 8.7) | 5 | 2.4 (0.7, 7.6)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum IL-6 (median)
Week 4 | 3 | 2.8 (0.7, 3.1) | 4 | 2.1 (0.7, 5.5) | 4 | 2.4 (0.7, 10.2)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum LDL cholesterol (median)
Baseline | 8 | 125 (79, 189) | 6 | 115 (92, 145) | 7 | 102 (7, 122)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum LDL cholesterol (median)
decreases
Week 2 | 6 | 114 (83, 143) | 5 | 87 (58, 130) | 5 | 78 (60, 101)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum LDL cholesterol (median)
Week 4 | 3 | 113 (104, 189) | 4 | 104 (73, 130) | 3 | 90 (52, 101)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum total cholesterol (median)
Baseline | 8 | 192 (120, 238) | 6 | 180 (159, 256) | 7 | 166 (145, 188)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum total cholesterol (median)
Week 2 | 6 | 183 (153, 209) | 5 | 173 (124, 224) | 5 | 148 (137, 191)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum total cholesterol (median)
Week 4 | 3 | 186 (157, 232) | 4 | 179 (140, 190) | 3 | 147 (116, 154)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum triglycerides (median)
Baseline | 8 | 111 (33, 311) | 6 | 87 (31, 146) | 7 | 75 (73, 121)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum triglycerides (median)
Week 2 | 6 | 71 (37, 229) | 5 | 105 (48, 138) | 5 | 98 (54, 166)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
serum triglycerides (median)
Week 4 | 3 | 92 (31, 97) | 4 | 73 (35, 142) | 3 | 113 (73, 206)
PMID:31477152 · one of two readings recorded this
24 hour urinary protein
no effect
24 hour urinary protein (g/24 hour) | N = 14 1.81 (4.24) | N = 10 2.97 (3.18) | N = 10 1.23 (1.09) | N = 5 3.78 (3.89) | N = 3 1.11 (0.84) | N = 2 6.66 (0.29) | N = 4 3.37 (3.64) | N = 2 12.42 (7.86) | N = 2 4.34 (3.30) | N = 1 9.90 (–) | N = 1 0.37 (–) | N = 2 0.58 (0.56) | 0.58 (0.18, 0.99) | −1.17 (−3.65, 1.01)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
24 hour urinary protein
unclear
24 hour urinary protein (g/24 hour) | N = 14 1.81 (4.24) | N = 10 2.97 (3.18) | N = 10 1.23 (1.09) | N = 5 3.78 (3.89) | N = 3 1.11 (0.84) | N = 2 6.66 (0.29) | N = 4 3.37 (3.64) | N = 2 12.42 (7.86) | N = 2 4.34 (3.30) | N = 1 9.90 (–) | N = 1 0.37 (–) | N = 2 0.58 (0.56) | 0.58 (0.18, 0.99) | −1.17 (−3.65, 1.01)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
birthweight of surviving infants
no effect
mean birthweights were 1.1 kg (SD 0.6) and 1.1 kg (SD 0.5) for babies born to mothers in the pravastatin and placebo groups, respectively
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
diastolic blood pressure
no effect
Blood pressure (systolic/ diastolic mmHg) | N = 30 159.9 (15.6)/ 97.9 (5.4) | N = 32 167.1 (18.3)/99.6 (6.9) | N = 29 146.6 (16.3)/ 88.4 (9.9) | N = 31 145.4(11.8)/ 89.4 (5.9) | N = 24 140.8 (8.9)/ 85.7 (8.8) | N = 24 146.9 (11.8)/ 91.2 (9.8) | N = 16 145.3 (11.8)/ 88.1 (9.4) | N = 13 147.0 (15.3)/ 88.2 (11.3) | N = 5 137.1 (17.8)/ 85.6 (12.7) | N = 5 138.6 (8.2)/ 84.7 (9.4) | N = 1 135.5 (–)/ 75.8 (–) | N = 4 151.2 (22.6)/ 91.2 (13.2) | Systolic − 1.4 (−8.6, 5.7) Diastolic − 1.0 (−5.0, 3.1) | Systolic − 0.5 (−6.0, 5.0) Diastolic − 2.0 (−5.9, 1.9)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
diastolic blood pressure
no effect
Blood pressure (systolic/ diastolic mmHg) | N = 30 159.9 (15.6)/ 97.9 (5.4) | N = 32 167.1 (18.3)/99.6 (6.9) | N = 29 146.6 (16.3)/ 88.4 (9.9) | N = 31 145.4(11.8)/ 89.4 (5.9) | N = 24 140.8 (8.9)/ 85.7 (8.8) | N = 24 146.9 (11.8)/ 91.2 (9.8) | N = 16 145.3 (11.8)/ 88.1 (9.4) | N = 13 147.0 (15.3)/ 88.2 (11.3) | N = 5 137.1 (17.8)/ 85.6 (12.7) | N = 5 138.6 (8.2)/ 84.7 (9.4) | N = 1 135.5 (–)/ 75.8 (–) | N = 4 151.2 (22.6)/ 91.2 (13.2) | Systolic − 1.4 (−8.6, 5.7) Diastolic − 1.0 (−5.0, 3.1) | Systolic − 0.5 (−6.0, 5.0) Diastolic − 2.0 (−5.9, 1.9)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
infant survival
unclear
All 30 infants born to mothers who received pravastatin survived, whereas 29 of 32 infants from women who received placebo survived
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal diastolic blood pressure at 6 weeks postpartum
no effect
By 6 weeks postpartum, maternal blood pressure had returned to normal in both groups (pravastatin group mean blood pressure 128.1 mmHg [SD 18.2]/80.4 mmHg [SD 13.0]; placebo group mean blood pressure 128.0 mmHg [SD 13.0]/79.4 mmHg [SD 11.4])
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal plasma PlGF
no effect, p = 0.4
PlGF (pg/ml) | N = 29 23.53 (46.60) | N = 31 20.37 (40.33) | N = 27 37.17 (121.40) | N = 29 18.67 (35.27) | N = 20 15.98 (13.04) | N = 19 25.39 (59.77) | N = 15 57.56 (177.53) | N = 10 36.13 (89.51) | N = 5 82.13 (150.63) | N = 4 40.15 (39.81) | N = 1 528.60 (–) | N = 3 43.84 (58.80) | 8.94 (−13.33, 31.20) P = 0.4 | 8.77 (−11.61, 29.15) P = 0.4
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal plasma PlGF
no effect, p = 0.4
PlGF (pg/ml) | N = 29 23.53 (46.60) | N = 31 20.37 (40.33) | N = 27 37.17 (121.40) | N = 29 18.67 (35.27) | N = 20 15.98 (13.04) | N = 19 25.39 (59.77) | N = 15 57.56 (177.53) | N = 10 36.13 (89.51) | N = 5 82.13 (150.63) | N = 4 40.15 (39.81) | N = 1 528.60 (–) | N = 3 43.84 (58.80) | 8.94 (−13.33, 31.20) P = 0.4 | 8.77 (−11.61, 29.15) P = 0.4
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal plasma sFlt-1 (primary outcome)
no effect, p = 0.5
differences were small and not statistically different over days 1–3 (292 pg/ml, 95% CI −1175 to 592; P = 0.5)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal plasma sFlt-1
no effect, p = 0.9
days 1–14 (48 pg/ml, 95% CI −1009 to 913; P = 0.9)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal plasma sFlt-1
sFLT‐1 (pg/ml) | N = 29 8296 (5046) | N = 31 11 065 (6665) | N = 27 8516 (4795) | N = 29 12 241 (6390) | N = 19 9210 (5037) | N = 19 106 09 (5367) | N = 15 7518 (5837) | N = 10 8132 (4050) | N = 5 12 811 (8937) | N = 4 8458 (4109) | N = 1 1293 (–) | N = 3 12 205 (10341) | −292 (−1175, 592) P = 0.5 | −49 (−1010, 913) P = 0.9
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal sFlt-1:PlGF ratio
no effect, p = 0.7
sFLT‐1/PlGF | N = 29 979 (1076) | N = 31 1782 (1697) | N = 27 947 (884)e | N = 29 2012 (1779)e | N = 19 1078 (940) | N = 19 1747 (1388) | N = 15 958 (793) | N = 10 1479 (1228) | N = 5 1557 (2118) | N = 4 653 (756) | N = 1 2 (–) | N = 3 2361 (3696) | −37 (−364, 291) P = 0.8 | −54 (−364, 255) P = 0.7
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal sFlt-1:PlGF ratio
no effect, p = 0.8
sFLT‐1/PlGF | N = 29 979 (1076) | N = 31 1782 (1697) | N = 27 947 (884)e | N = 29 2012 (1779)e | N = 19 1078 (940) | N = 19 1747 (1388) | N = 15 958 (793) | N = 10 1479 (1228) | N = 5 1557 (2118) | N = 4 653 (756) | N = 1 2 (–) | N = 3 2361 (3696) | −37 (−364, 291) P = 0.8 | −54 (−364, 255) P = 0.7
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
maternal systolic blood pressure at 6 weeks postpartum
no effect
By 6 weeks postpartum, maternal blood pressure had returned to normal in both groups (pravastatin group mean blood pressure 128.1 mmHg [SD 18.2]/80.4 mmHg [SD 13.0]; placebo group mean blood pressure 128.0 mmHg [SD 13.0]/79.4 mmHg [SD 11.4])
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
mean maternal plasma sFlt-1 over the first 3 days after randomisation (primary), measured by BRAHMS Kryptor; also PlGF, sFlt-1:PlGF ratio, time from randomisation to childbirth, necrotising enterocolitis and retinopathy of prematurity counts, in early-onset pre-eclampsia, pravastatin 40 mg daily versus placebo
no effect, difference 292 pg/ml (95% CI -1175 to 592) over days 1-3, p = 0.5
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
Maternal plasma levels of sFlt‐1 were lower in the pravastatin group compared with placebo, although differences were small and not statistically different over days 1–3 (292 pg/ml, 95% CI −1175 to 592; P = 0.5) and days 1–14 (48 pg/ml, 95% CI −1009 to 913; P = 0.9).
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
median time from randomisation to childbirth
no effect
The median time from randomisation to childbirth was 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5–14 days) for women in the pravastatin group and 7 days (IQR 4–11 days) for the placebo group
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
necrotising enterocolitis in babies
decreases
a higher proportion of babies developed necrotising enterocolitis in the placebo group (n = 6; 20%) compared with the pravastatin group (n = 3; 10%)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
necrotising enterocolitis in infants of women with early-onset pre-eclampsia, pravastatin 40 mg daily versus placebo (descriptive, untested; Bell stage not stated). The primary endpoint, maternal plasma sFlt-1 over days 1-3, has no outcome node and was null (difference -292 pg/ml, 95% CI -1175 to 592, P = 0.5). Retinopathy of prematurity was reported the same way (8 of 29, 28% placebo versus 4 of 30, 13% pravastatin).
Not recorded as a finding: the direction is carried only as a signed number
However, a higher proportion of babies developed necrotising enterocolitis in the placebo group (n = 6; 20%) compared with the pravastatin group (n = 3; 10%).
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
retinopathy of prematurity in babies
decreases
retinopathy of prematurity was more common in the placebo group (n = 8; 28%) compared with the pravastatin group (n = 4; 13%
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect
Blood pressure (systolic/ diastolic mmHg) | N = 30 159.9 (15.6)/ 97.9 (5.4) | N = 32 167.1 (18.3)/99.6 (6.9) | N = 29 146.6 (16.3)/ 88.4 (9.9) | N = 31 145.4(11.8)/ 89.4 (5.9) | N = 24 140.8 (8.9)/ 85.7 (8.8) | N = 24 146.9 (11.8)/ 91.2 (9.8) | N = 16 145.3 (11.8)/ 88.1 (9.4) | N = 13 147.0 (15.3)/ 88.2 (11.3) | N = 5 137.1 (17.8)/ 85.6 (12.7) | N = 5 138.6 (8.2)/ 84.7 (9.4) | N = 1 135.5 (–)/ 75.8 (–) | N = 4 151.2 (22.6)/ 91.2 (13.2) | Systolic − 1.4 (−8.6, 5.7) Diastolic − 1.0 (−5.0, 3.1) | Systolic − 0.5 (−6.0, 5.0) Diastolic − 2.0 (−5.9, 1.9)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect
Blood pressure (systolic/ diastolic mmHg) | N = 30 159.9 (15.6)/ 97.9 (5.4) | N = 32 167.1 (18.3)/99.6 (6.9) | N = 29 146.6 (16.3)/ 88.4 (9.9) | N = 31 145.4(11.8)/ 89.4 (5.9) | N = 24 140.8 (8.9)/ 85.7 (8.8) | N = 24 146.9 (11.8)/ 91.2 (9.8) | N = 16 145.3 (11.8)/ 88.1 (9.4) | N = 13 147.0 (15.3)/ 88.2 (11.3) | N = 5 137.1 (17.8)/ 85.6 (12.7) | N = 5 138.6 (8.2)/ 84.7 (9.4) | N = 1 135.5 (–)/ 75.8 (–) | N = 4 151.2 (22.6)/ 91.2 (13.2) | Systolic − 1.4 (−8.6, 5.7) Diastolic − 1.0 (−5.0, 3.1) | Systolic − 0.5 (−6.0, 5.0) Diastolic − 2.0 (−5.9, 1.9)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
time from randomisation to childbirth
no effect, p = 0.6
hazard ratio [HR] 0.84; 95% CI 0.50–1.40) but this difference was not significant (P = 0.6)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
time from randomisation to childbirth
no effect, p = 0.4
continued their pregnancy for 11 days (IQR 6–14 days) compared with 7 days (IQR 6–11 days) for those who received placebo (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.41–1.42; P = 0.4)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
time to delivery by baseline PlGF (post-hoc predictor)
decreases, p = 0.03
only PlGF (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–1.00, P = 0.03) and the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12–1.57, P = 0.0009)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
time to delivery by baseline sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (post-hoc predictor)
increases, p = 0.0009
only PlGF (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–1.00, P = 0.03) and the sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12–1.57, P = 0.0009)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
urinary protein:creatinine ratio
no effect
Urinary protein: creatine ratio (mg/mmol) | N = 28 3.34 (3.92) | N = 32 4.06 (4.69) | N = 22 3.87 (5.10) | N = 27 5.56 (5.82) | N = 16 6.86 (8.85) | N = 17 7.82 (7.48) | N = 9 7.73 (5.28) | N = 10 8.54 (7.91) | N = 4 8.04 (2.25) | N = 3 1.89 (2.88) | N = 0 (–) | N = 3 3.63 (4.56) | −0.82 (−2.90. 1.26) | −0.87 (−3.30, 1.55)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
urinary protein:creatinine ratio
no effect
Urinary protein: creatine ratio (mg/mmol) | N = 28 3.34 (3.92) | N = 32 4.06 (4.69) | N = 22 3.87 (5.10) | N = 27 5.56 (5.82) | N = 16 6.86 (8.85) | N = 17 7.82 (7.48) | N = 9 7.73 (5.28) | N = 10 8.54 (7.91) | N = 4 8.04 (2.25) | N = 3 1.89 (2.88) | N = 0 (–) | N = 3 3.63 (4.56) | −0.82 (−2.90. 1.26) | −0.87 (−3.30, 1.55)
PMID:31715077 · one of two readings recorded this
birth weight
no effect
Birth weight was higher (mean difference 299 grams, 95% CI: −215 – 812)
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
apparent oral clearance at 20 mg versus 10 mg dose
no effect
Nevertheless, the apparent oral clearance values were similar
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
gestational age at delivery
no effect
gestational age at delivery longer (mean difference 1.5 weeks, 95% CI −0.4 – 3.3)
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of preeclampsia (with and without severe features, adjudicated by a blinded panel) in pregnant women at high risk, pravastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo; also indicated preterm delivery before 37 weeks and steady-state pravastatin pharmacokinetics in pregnancy
n = 20
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
In the pravastatin group, two (20%) patients developed preeclampsia without severe features compared with 5 (50%) in the placebo group (all with severe features).
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
indicated preterm delivery before 37 weeks, pravastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo in 20 pregnant women (pilot trial, safety and pharmacokinetics primary); preeclampsia rate (no node) was reported alongside
Not recorded as a finding: the direction is carried only as a signed number
Similarly, three (30%) patients had indicated preterm deliveries before 37 weeks in the pravastatin group compared with six (60%) in the placebo group (Table 4).
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
indicated preterm delivery before 37 weeks
decreases
three (30%) patients had indicated preterm deliveries before 37 weeks in the pravastatin group compared with six (60%) in the placebo group
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
low-dose aspirin use
no effect
overall 70% and not significantly different between the two groups
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
preeclampsia with severe features
decreases, p = 0.003
preeclampsia with severe features was 0% vs. 40% (P=0.003)
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
preeclampsia without severe features
decreases
In the pravastatin group, two (20%) patients developed preeclampsia without severe features compared with 5 (50%) in the placebo group
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
preeclampsia
decreases, p = 0.03
The combined rate of preeclampsia was 10% in the pravastatin group compared with 45% in the placebo group (RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05–0.90, P=0.03)
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
preterm delivery before 37 weeks
decreases, p = 0.048
preterm delivery < 37 weeks was 20% compared with 55% (RR0.36, 95% CI: 0.14–0.95, P=0.048)
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
steady-state Cmax at 20 mg versus 10 mg dose
increases
the average maximum concentration and area under the concentration time curve values were more than two-fold higher following 20-mg dosing compared with the 10-mg pravastatin dose
PMID:34033812 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol
decreases
Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides
decreases
Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol, dose-response across doses
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence reports absence of a DOSE-related effect, not a pravastatin-versus-placebo contrast on HDL-C; not recorded as no_effect
There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol.
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol dose-response
no effect
There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol dose-response slope per two-fold dose increase
decreases
For every two-fold dose increase there was a 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 4.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol dose-response (log dose)
decreases
Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol
decreases
Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides dose-response (log dose)
decreases
Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
withdrawals due to adverse effects, pooled risk ratio versus placebo
RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03)
Not recorded as a finding: Interval spans 1 and no direction word in the sentence; direction_stated_but_not_significant shape.
The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03).
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
withdrawals due to adverse effects, pravastatin versus placebo
RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03)
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence carries a risk ratio and interval but no direction word; direction not in words
The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03).
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
withdrawals due to adverse effects
no effect
The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03)
PMID:37721222 · one of two readings recorded this
age at baseline (median)
unclear, p = 0.01
Age, median (IQR) | 47 (38–68) | 45.5 (38–57) | 55 (42–68) | 0.01
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
hs-CRP
increases, p = 0.02
the control group demonstrated the sharp increase in the hs-CRP level 3 times higher than the baseline during the early period (0.040 to 0.140 mg/dL, Z score: -2.371, P =.02)
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
hs-CRP
decreases, p = 0.03
Control group | 0.040 (0.040-0.110) | 0.140 (0.050-0.250) | 0.040 (0.030-0.10) | -2.371 | 0.02 | -2.207 | 0.03
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
hs-CRP
no effect, p = 0.07
its level decreased during the early period (0.070 to 0.045 mg/dL, Z score: -1.843, P =.07)
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
hs-CRP
no effect, p = 0.33
changed to plateau during the late period (0.045 to 0.050 mg/dL, Z score: − 0.985, P =.33)
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
improved/resolved intimal flap on VW-MRI
no effect
Improved/resolved | 5 (83.3) | 2 (66.7) | 5 (83.3) | 3 (100.0)
PMID:40461956 · one of two readings recorded this
Sources cited
3 papers
- Subject
- pravastatin
- Findings
- 6
- Papers
- 3
Pravastatin for lowering lipids.record2023PMID:377212223 findings
Effect of pravastatin treatment on circulating adiponectin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.record2019PMID:311907421 finding
Long-Term Effect of Pravastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Complex Thickness: The J-STARS Echo Study (Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke).record2018PMID:291918502 findings