Endpoint
Adverse reaction incidence (unstandardised)
CAT:outcome/adverse-reaction-incidence-ungradedreported in event rate
Method
Proportion of participants for whom investigators recorded at least one adverse reaction attributed to the study product, tallied by each trial's own ascertainment with no severity classification system applied.
The method is part of the endpoint identity. Studies measuring the same quantity by a different method are held as separate endpoints.
Notes
Any adverse event incidence shares the denominator but not the numerator: that node counts events regardless of attributed causality, this one counts only those an investigator judged related, and the causality judgement is unblinded and unstandardised. The second near-miss is CTCAE-graded adverse event counts (PMID 32840126). Both are proportions of participants, but a graded tally separates severities — a grade-1 nausea and a grade-3 hepatitis are distinguishable there and are indistinguishable here — so the rates are not comparable in either direction and this node's value cannot be split by severity after the fact. Serious adverse event incidence and withdrawal due to adverse events are nested subsets.
Findings
2 findings from 2 compounds, strongest first.
berberine — no detected effect on
LikelyGrade B, Likely. Human evidence, limited replication or design limits.FindingNull result“Nonetheless, the impact of BBR on reducing adverse reactions was not statistically significant (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.42, 1.33], P > 0.05).”
Quoted verbatim from Efficacy and safety of berberine plus 5-ASA for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- patients with ulcerative colitis; berberine plus 5-aminosalicylic acid versus 5-aminosalicylic acid
Efficacy and safety of berberine plus 5-ASA for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2024PMID:39241013
caffeine — decreases
LikelyGrade B, Likely. Human evidence, limited replication or design limits.Finding“The analysis found that compared with aminophylline, infants in the caffeine group had a lower chance of developing total adverse effects (OR 0.41, 95%CI: 0.17–0.97, P = 0.042).”
Quoted verbatim from Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Preterm infants (<37 weeks gestation) with apnea of prematurity; caffeine citrate against an ACTIVE COMPARATOR (aminophylline), not placebo; safety outcome pooled from 4 of the 10 included studies.
Effect 0.41 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.97
Comparative efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treating apnea of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2022PMID:36121807