What the evidence says
How to read these marks1 finding · 1 endpoint · 1 paper · by evidence strength
What moved
1 finding
Decreases all-cause mortality
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Finding“Both warfarin (IPTW aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38–0.74; p < 0.001) and DOACs (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43–0.78; p < 0.001) were associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with no anticoagulation (Table 3, Fig. 2, and Supplementary Fig. 1).”
Quoted verbatim from Comparative efficacy and safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation.. - Study
- cohort
- Population
- Korean patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; warfarin compared with no anticoagulation, inverse-probability-weighted retrospective cohort
Effect 0.53 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74
Comparative efficacy and safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation.2026PMID:41531219Permalink
What the reference databases state
Statements
2 statements
2 statements · 1 reference database · Subject: warfarin · Sources: ChEBI
- warfarin is converted to (R)-warfarinCompoundChEBI CHEBI:10033Inferred only
- warfarin is converted to (S)-warfarinCompoundChEBI CHEBI:10033Inferred only
Papers screened
1,694 papers
- Compound
- warfarin
- Screened
- 1,694
- Admitted
- 1
- Discarded
- 97
- Not read
- 1,596
- Showing
- 200 of 1,694
Produced a finding1 paper
and 1 more.
Discarded: another reason, stated per paper35 papers
and 35 more.
Discarded: no extractable result31 papers
and 31 more.
Discarded: the wrong intervention19 papers
and 19 more.
Discarded: no comparator10 papers
and 10 more.
Discarded: an endpoint this vocabulary does not hold2 papers
and 2 more.
Not read yet1,596 papers
- PMID:299142932026-10-11
- PMID:299455962026-10-11
- PMID:299492042026-10-11
- PMID:299561342026-10-11
- PMID:299733922026-10-11
- PMID:299816402026-10-11
- PMID:299845142026-10-11
- PMID:299936192026-10-11
- PMID:300100552026-10-11
- PMID:300511642026-10-11
- PMID:300512152026-10-11
- PMID:300765152026-10-11
and 1,584 more.
Measured, not recorded
- Compound
- warfarin
- Endpoints measured
- 262 endpoints
- Recorded as a finding
- No
Show what was measured
all-cause mortality
no effect, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.33-2.67
Two studies reported on the risk of death, finding no difference between NPP and UMC (RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.33 to 2.67, I2 = 0%).
PMID:40456519 · one of two readings recorded this
death
no effect, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.67
Two studies reported on the risk of death, finding no difference between NPP and UMC (RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.33 to 2.67, I2 = 0%).
PMID:40456519 · one of two readings recorded this
hemorrhage
no effect, RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.63
There was no significant difference in the risk of hemorrhage between NPP and UMC when combining results from the 5 studies reporting this outcome (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 0.44 to 2.63, I2 = 0%).
PMID:40456519 · both readings recorded this
patient satisfaction
no effect, SMD 0.56, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.15
There was a non-significant higher patient satisfaction in the NPP group compared to UMC in the 3 studies reporting this outcome (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.56; 95% CI -0.04 to 1.15, I2 = 85%).
PMID:40456519 · both readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range (TTR) for ambulatory warfarin management
no effect, MD 1.64%, 95% CI -1.86 to 5.16
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
There was no significant difference in TTR (mean difference [MD] 1.64%; 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.86 to 5.16, I2 = 0%) between NPP and UMC.
PMID:40456519 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range (TTR)
no effect, MD 1.64%, 95% CI -1.86 to 5.16
There was no significant difference in TTR (mean difference [MD] 1.64%; 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.86 to 5.16, I2 = 0%) between NPP and UMC.
PMID:40456519 · both readings recorded this
time spent in therapeutic range (TTR), warfarin management by non-physician providers vs usual medical care
no effect, MD 1.64%, 95% CI -1.86 to 5.16
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
There was no significant difference in TTR (mean difference [MD] 1.64%; 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.86 to 5.16, I2 = 0%) between NPP and UMC.
PMID:40456519 · one of two readings recorded this
bleeding incidence rate
n = 18
The incidence rate of bleeding in our cohort was 5.3 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.4–13.6)
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
creatinine at baseline
n = 18
Creatinine – Mean and SD | 0.95 ± 0.31 mg/dl
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
DOAC as first line of treatment
n = 18
DOAC as first line of treatment (%) | 27.8
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
haemoglobin at baseline
n = 18
Haemoglobin – Mean and SD | 13.2 ± 1.67 g/dl
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
mean follow-up duration
n = 18
The mean follow-up was 50.1 ± 24.1 months
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
patients previously on vitamin K antagonist
n = 18
Previous therapy with VKA (%) | 72.2
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
recurrent VTE and other thrombotic events
no effect, n = 18
During the observation period, no VTE relapses or other thrombotic events were recorded
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
total bleeding events
n = 18
Of the total of 4 bleeding events occurred during follow-up, two were major bleeding events
PMID:40879863 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
Several studies have shown a trend toward lower all-cause mortality among patients assigned to NOACs, particularly among patients with a low bleeding risk profile.
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality (secondary outcome)
unclear
Several studies have shown a trend toward lower all-cause mortality among patients assigned to NOACs, particularly among patients with a low bleeding risk profile.
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding after aortic bioprosthetic valve replacement, pooled hazard ratio
increases, HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88–1.68, p = 0.22
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
Compared with warfarin, NOACs may increase the risk of major bleeding (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88–1.68, p = 0.22, I² = 72.4%).
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.88-1.68, p = 0.22
Compared with warfarin, NOACs may increase the risk of major bleeding (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88–1.68, p = 0.22, I² = 72.4%).
PMID:41222886 · both readings recorded this
minor bleeding events
no effect
However, it is important to note that in the studies that reported minor bleeding, the incidence of these events was similar between the two anticoagulants.
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
thromboembolic events (arterial thromboembolism, stroke, MI, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, DVT, PE, TIA)
HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09, p = 0.31
The pooled results from these studies revealed that the NOAC cohort had a slight reduction in thromboembolic events compared with the warfarin cohort (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.09, p = 0.31, I² = 40.8%).
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
thromboembolic events (arterial thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, DVT, PE, TIA, intracardiac/bioprosthesis thrombosis), pooled hazard ratio
HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09, p = 0.31
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
The pooled results from these studies revealed that the NOAC cohort had a slight reduction in thromboembolic events compared with the warfarin cohort (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.09, p = 0.31, I² = 40.8%).
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
thromboembolic events
no effect, HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.09, p = 0.31
The pooled results from these studies revealed that the NOAC cohort had a slight reduction in thromboembolic events compared with the warfarin cohort (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.09, p = 0.31, I² = 40.8%).
PMID:41222886 · one of two readings recorded this
baseline INR (median)
no effect, p = 0.233
Baseline INR | 1.1 | (1.00–1.16) | 1.1 | (1.02–1.17) | 0.233a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
day of the first INR assessment (median)
decreases, p = 0.001
Day of the first INR assessment | 7.0 | (5.00–9.00) | 4.0 | (4.00–4.00) | < 0.001a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
first INR value (median)
increases, p = 0.001
First INR value | 1.4 | (1.13–1.91) | 1.7 | (1.32–2.24) | < 0.001a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
number of dose adjustments prior to first therapeutic INR (median)
decreases, p = 0.003
Number of Dose Adjustments Prior First Therapeutic INR | 2.0 | (0.00–3.00) | 1.0 | (0.00–2.00) | 0.003a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
plan after first INR visit: increase dose (n)
decreases, p = 0.001
Increase dose | 250 | (49.9) | 88 | (31.5) | < 0.001b
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
plan after first INR visit: loading dose (n)
decreases, p = 0.005
Loading dose | 18 | (3.6) | 1 | (0.4) | 0.005b
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
plan after first INR visit: maintain dose (n)
no effect, p = 0.075
Maintain dose | 183 | (36.5) | 120 | (43.0) | 0.075b
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
plan after first INR visit: reduce dose (n)
increases, p = 0.003
Reduce dose | 61 | (12.2) | 56 | (20.1) | 0.003b
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
plan after first INR visit: withhold dose (n)
no effect, p = 0.149
Withhold dose | 25 | (5.0) | 21 | (7.5) | 0.149b
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 255
Within 0–12 Months | 694 | -0.600 | < 0.001 | 0.416 | 439 | -0.653 | < 0.001 | 0.488 | 255 | -0.513 | < 0.001 | 0.290
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 263
Within 0–3 Months | 739 | -0.658 | < 0.001 | 0.361 | 476 | -0.680 | < 0.001 | 0.382 | 263 | -0.615 | < 0.001 | 0.315
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 260
Within 0–6 Months | 721 | -0.710 | < 0.001 | 0.500 | 461 | -0.755 | < 0.001 | 0.533 | 260 | -0.620 | < 0.001 | 0.435
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 439
Within 0–12 Months | 694 | -0.600 | < 0.001 | 0.416 | 439 | -0.653 | < 0.001 | 0.488 | 255 | -0.513 | < 0.001 | 0.290
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 476
Within 0–3 Months | 739 | -0.658 | < 0.001 | 0.361 | 476 | -0.680 | < 0.001 | 0.382 | 263 | -0.615 | < 0.001 | 0.315
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 461
Within 0–6 Months | 721 | -0.710 | < 0.001 | 0.500 | 461 | -0.755 | < 0.001 | 0.533 | 260 | -0.620 | < 0.001 | 0.435
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 694
Within 0–12 Months | 694 | -0.600 | < 0.001 | 0.416 | 439 | -0.653 | < 0.001 | 0.488 | 255 | -0.513 | < 0.001 | 0.290
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 739
Within 0–3 Months | 739 | -0.658 | < 0.001 | 0.361 | 476 | -0.680 | < 0.001 | 0.382 | 263 | -0.615 | < 0.001 | 0.315
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
Spearman correlation of TTR with time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 721
Within 0–6 Months | 721 | -0.710 | < 0.001 | 0.500 | 461 | -0.755 | < 0.001 | 0.533 | 260 | -0.620 | < 0.001 | 0.435
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-12 months, adjusted (GLM)
no effect, p = 0.66
0–12 Months | 63.3 | (1.04) | 63.9 | (1.35) | 0.717 | 65.7 | (5.19) | 64.8 | (4.99) | 0.660a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-12 months, crude
no effect, p = 0.717
0–12 Months | 63.3 | (1.04) | 63.9 | (1.35) | 0.717 | 65.7 | (5.19) | 64.8 | (4.99) | 0.660a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-3 months, adjusted (GLM)
no effect, p = 0.709
0–3 Months | 49.4 | (1.33) | 52.4 | (1.79) | 0.183 | 45.9 | (6.73) | 45.0 | (6.48) | 0.709a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-3 months, crude
no effect, p = 0.183
0–3 Months | 49.4 | (1.33) | 52.4 | (1.79) | 0.183 | 45.9 | (6.73) | 45.0 | (6.48) | 0.709a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-6 months, adjusted (GLM)
no effect, p = 0.721
0–6 Months | 55.2 | (1.23) | 58.1 | (1.64) | 0.160 | 59.8 | (6.16) | 58.9 | (5.94) | 0.721a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range 0-6 months, crude
no effect, p = 0.16
0–6 Months | 55.2 | (1.23) | 58.1 | (1.64) | 0.160 | 59.8 | (6.16) | 58.9 | (5.94) | 0.721a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time to INR stabilization, adjusted (GLM)
no effect, p = 0.248
Total Days to Achieve INR Stabilization | 138.6 | (4.41) | 111.8 | (5.93) | < 0.001 | 104.1 | (22.43) | 94.1 | (21.55) | 0.248a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
time to INR stabilization, crude
decreases, p = 0.001
Total Days to Achieve INR Stabilization | 138.6 | (4.41) | 111.8 | (5.93) | < 0.001 | 104.1 | (22.43) | 94.1 | (21.55) | 0.248a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
total days to achieve first therapeutic INR (median)
decreases, p = 0.001
Total Days to Achieve First Therapeutic INR | 30.0 | (14.00–61.80) | 14.0 | (6.80–38.30) | < 0.001a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
total warfarin dose per week to reach first therapeutic INR (median)
increases, p = 0.021
Total Warfarin Dose/Week to Reach First Therapeutic INR | 17.5 | (14.00–24.50) | 21.0 | (14.00–24.50) | 0.021a
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
TTR by quartile of time to INR stabilization
Patients in the fastest quartile (Quartile 1: < 55 days) achieved the highest TTR (80.6%)
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
TTR by quartile of time to INR stabilization
followed by Quartile 2 (55–97 days, 73.6%)
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
TTR by quartile of time to INR stabilization
Quartile 3 (98–181 days, 66.4%)
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
TTR by quartile of time to INR stabilization
decreases, p = 0.001
the slowest quartile (Q4: > 182 days) with the lowest TTR (47.3%) (p < 0.001)
PMID:41528716 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
decreases, p = 0.001
DOACs (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43–0.78; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
decreases, p = 0.001
Both warfarin (IPTW aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38–0.74; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
no effect, p = 0.667
All-cause mortality was similar between DOACs and warfarin (IPTW aHR, 1.09 [0.75–1.58]; p = 0.667)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
gastrointestinal bleeding
no effect, p = 0.134
a similar risk of GIB (IPTW aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.92–1.94; p = 0.134)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
gastrointestinal bleeding
increases, p = 0.001
GIB (IPTW aHR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.27–2.63; p = 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
gastrointestinal bleeding
no effect, p = 0.083
GIB (IPTW aHR, 0.73 [0.51–1.04]; p = 0.083)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage
increases, p = 0.001
DOAC users had an increased risk of ICH (IPTW aHR, 5.02; 95% CI, 2.66–9.47; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage
increases, p = 0.001
ICH (IPTW aHR, 7.18; 95% CI, 3.82–13.50; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
intracranial hemorrhage
no effect, p = 0.081
ICH (IPTW aHR, 0.70 [0.47–1.05]; p = 0.081)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke or systemic embolism composite (IS/SE), time-to-event
decreases, IPTW aHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-1.00 vs no anticoagulation, p = 0.048
Not recorded as a finding: Composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism; stroke-incidence node is stroke only, so near-miss
Relative to no anticoagulation, both warfarin (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–1.00; p = 0.048) and DOACs (IPTW aHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.69; p = 0.002) were associated with a lower risk of IS/SE.
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke or systemic embolism composite (IS/SE), warfarin vs no anticoagulation
decreases, IPTW aHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-1.00, p = 0.048
Not recorded as a finding: Composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism; stroke-incidence node is stroke only, so no node matches
Relative to no anticoagulation, both warfarin (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–1.00; p = 0.048) and DOACs (IPTW aHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.69; p = 0.002) were associated with a lower risk of IS/SE.
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (IS/SE)
decreases, p = 0.002
DOACs (IPTW aHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.69; p = 0.002) were associated with a lower risk of IS/SE
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (IS/SE)
decreases, p = 0.048
Relative to no anticoagulation, both warfarin (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–1.00; p = 0.048)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (IS/SE)
no effect, p = 0.282
DOACs had a risk of IS/SE comparable with warfarin (IPTW aHR, 0.66 [0.31–1.40]; p = 0.282)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding by ISTH criteria (with intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding), warfarin vs no anticoagulation
increases, IPTW aHR 2.69; 95% CI 2.06-3.51
Not recorded as a finding: No major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding node in the outcome list
For safety outcomes, warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (IPTW aHR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.06–3.51; p < 0.001) driven by increased risks of both ICH (IPTW aHR, 7.18; 95% CI, 3.82–13.50; p < 0.001) and GIB (IPTW aHR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.27–2.63; p = 0.001) versus no anticoagulation.
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding, ISTH criteria, time-to-event
increases, IPTW aHR 2.69; 95% CI 2.06-3.51 vs no anticoagulation, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: No major-bleeding outcome node in the list
For safety outcomes, warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (IPTW aHR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.06–3.51; p < 0.001) driven by increased risks of both ICH (IPTW aHR, 7.18; 95% CI, 3.82–13.50; p < 0.001) and GIB (IPTW aHR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.27–2.63; p = 0.001) versus no anticoagulation.
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
increases, p = 0.035
DOACs were also associated with a higher risk of MB (IPTW aHR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02–1.84; p = 0.035)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
increases, p = 0.001
warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (IPTW aHR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.06–3.51; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
decreases, p = 0.001
a significantly lower risk of MB (IPTW aHR, 0.51 [0.40–0.66]; p < 0.001)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
no effect, p = 0.002
DOACs (aHR, 1.02 [0.52–2.00]; p for interaction = 0.002)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
no effect, p = 0.002
warfarin (aHR, 1.07 [0.56–2.04]; p for interaction = 0.002)
PMID:41531219 · one of two readings recorded this
hemoglobin
p = 0.038, n = 136
Hb, g/L | 133.76 ± 14.52 | 128.00 ± 17.73 |.038
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
age
p = 0.125, n = 136
Age, years | 65.86 ± 10.30 | 61.90 ± 15.24 |.125
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
anti-platelet drug use
p = 0.001, n = 136
Anti-platelet drugs, n (%) | 30 (58.8) | 14 (16.5) | <.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: combined regression model
n = 136
Regression model | 0.900 (0.848–0.952) | 0.843 | 0.835
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: NXT
n = 136
NXT | 0.655 (0.561–0.749) | 0.745 | 0.565
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: PDW
n = 136
PDW | 0.797 (0.715–0.879) | 0.745 | 0.824
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: PT
n = 136
PT | 0.637 (0.541–0.733) | 0.608 | 0.624
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: RAVD
n = 136
RAVD | 0.628 (0.534–0.722) | 0.706 | 0.529
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
AUC for predicting high-quality TTR: RDW
n = 136
RDW | 0.645 (0.549–0.742) | 0.549 | 0.718
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
coronary heart disease prevalence
p = 0.001, n = 136
CHD, n (%) | 28 (54.9) | 18 (21.2) | <.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
left ventricular end-systolic diameter
p = 0.012, n = 136
LVDs, mm | 31.92 ± 6.14 | 35.37 ± 7.12 |.012
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: ACEI/ARB
no effect, p = 0.081, n = 136
ACEI/ARB |.081 | 0.370 (0.121–1.131)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: beta-blockers
no effect, p = 0.838, n = 136
Beta-blockers |.838 | 0.895 (0.310–2.587)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: left ventricular end-systolic diameter
no effect, p = 0.064, n = 136
LVDs |.064 | 0.928 (0.857–1.004)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: Naoxintong
unclear, p = 0.022, n = 136
NXT |.022 | 0.273 (0.090–0.831)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: platelet distribution width
unclear, p = 0.001, n = 136
PDW | <.001 | 0.460 (0.337–0.628)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: prothrombin time
unclear, p = 0.002, n = 136
PT |.002 | 1.123 (1.044–1.208)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: red cell distribution width
unclear, p = 0.001, n = 136
RDW |.001 | 1.774 (1.266–2.486)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
multivariable association with TTR: right atrial vertical diameter
unclear, p = 0.018, n = 136
RAVD |.018 | 1.054 (1.009–1.102)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
Naoxintong (NXT) use
p = 0.001, n = 136
NXT, n (%) | 38 (74.5) | 37 (43.5) | <.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
platelet distribution width
p = 0.001, n = 136
PDW, % | 14.53 ± 1.80 | 16.55 ± 1.68 | <.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
prothrombin time
p = 0.004, n = 136
PT, s | 20.85 ± 7.93 | 16.70 ± 6.29 |.004
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
red cell distribution width
p = 0.004, n = 136
RDW, % | 14.62 ± 2.09 | 13.55 ± 1.33 |.004
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
right atrial vertical diameter
p = 0.001, n = 136
RAVD, mm | 53.43 ± 12.30 | 46.53 ± 9.64 |.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke volume
p = 0.046, n = 136
SV, ml | 57.08 ± 13.74 | 62.78 ± 16.22 |.046
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range
p = 0.001, n = 136
TTR, % | 75.78 ± 4.83 | 39.99 ± 14.01 | <.001
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: anti-platelet drugs
increases, p = 0.001, n = 136
Anti-platelet drugs | <.001 | 7.245(3.256–16.118)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: coronary heart disease
increases, p = 0.001, n = 136
CHD | <.001 | 4.531(2.123–9.673)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: Naoxintong
increases, p = 0.001, n = 136
NXT |.001 | 3.792(1.770–8.124)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: platelet distribution width
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 136
PDW, % | <.001 | 0.529(0.417–0.670)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: red cell distribution width
increases, p = 0.002, n = 136
RDW, % |.002 | 1.414(1.131–1.769)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
univariate risk of poor TTR: stroke
increases, p = 0.037, n = 136
Stroke |.037 | 2.121(1.046–4.299)
PMID:41553786 · one of two readings recorded this
1-year mRS 0-2 in herniation cases (n)
1-year mRS 0–2 in herniation cases | 4 (57.1%) | – | 1 (100%) | 3 (100%) | –
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
1-year mRS ≥3 in herniation cases (n)
1-year mRS ≥3 in herniation cases | 3 (42.9%) | – | 0 | 0 | –
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
age (mean ± SD)
no effect, p = 0.64
Age, years (mean ± SD) | 73.9 ± 8.8 | 72.5 ± 10.2 | 74.1 ± 9.1 | 71.8 ± 9.4 | 0.64
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
bilateral hematoma (n)
Bilateral hematoma, n (%) | 14 (43.7%) | 12 (31.6%) | 4 (33.3%) | 15 (34.1%)
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
cerebral herniation (n)
increases, p = 0.011
Cerebral herniation, n (%) | 7 (21.9%) | 1 (2.6%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0.011*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
diffuse cortical edema (n)
increases, p = 0.018
Diffuse cortical edema, n (%) | 9 (28.1%) | 4 (10.5%) | 3 (25.0%) | 5 (11.4%) | 0.018*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
favorable 1-year outcome (mRS 0-2) among all herniation cases
n = 11
At one-year follow-up, mRS scores indicated favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) in 8 of 11 patients (72.7%)
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
homogeneous subtype (n)
Homogeneous subtype, n (%) | 8 (25.0%) | 14 (36.8%) | 3 (25.0%) | 19 (43.2%)
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
laminar subtype (n)
Laminar subtype, n (%) | 7 (21.9%) | 9 (23.7%) | 3 (25.0%) | 11 (25.0%)
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
maximal hematoma thickness
no effect, p = 0.58
Maximal thickness (mm), mean ± SD | 16.5 ± 5.4 | 16.1 ± 5.2 | 15.9 ± 5.0 | 15.2 ± 4.8 | 0.58
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
midline shift
no effect, p = 0.61
Midline shift (mm), mean ± SD | 5.8 ± 2.3 | 5.5 ± 2.4 | 5.6 ± 2.2 | 5.2 ± 2.1 | 0.61
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (days from reported head trauma to onset of neurological symptoms) in surgically treated chronic subdural hematoma; also cerebral herniation and mRS at discharge
decreases, mean 23.6 days warfarin vs 46.5 days control, n = 32
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
The mean PTI was significantly shorter in the warfarin group (23.6 ± 9.4 days) compared with aspirin (41.2 ± 15.7 days) and control patients (46.5 ± 18.9 days) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001; Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc, warfarin vs. control p < 0.001, warfarin vs. aspirin p = 0.002).
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), mean
no effect, p = 0.12, n = 38
2 | Aspirin | 38 | 41.2 ± 15.7 | 40 (29-52) | 0.12
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), mean
decreases, p = 0.004, n = 12
3 | Warfarin + Aspirin | 12 | 28.4 ± 11.1 | 27 (20-36) | 0.004*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), mean
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 32
1 | Warfarin | 32 | 23.6 ± 9.4 | 22 (16-30) | <0.001*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), mean
n = 44
4 | Control | 44 | 46.5 ± 18.9 | 45 (34-59) | Reference
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), median
no effect, p = 0.12, n = 38
2 | Aspirin | 38 | 41.2 ± 15.7 | 40 (29-52) | 0.12
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), median
decreases, p = 0.004, n = 12
3 | Warfarin + Aspirin | 12 | 28.4 ± 11.1 | 27 (20-36) | 0.004*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), median
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 32
1 | Warfarin | 32 | 23.6 ± 9.4 | 22 (16-30) | <0.001*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), median
n = 44
4 | Control | 44 | 46.5 ± 18.9 | 45 (34-59) | Reference
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
post-traumatic interval (PTI), post-hoc pairwise
decreases, p = 0.002
Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc, warfarin vs. control p < 0.001, warfarin vs. aspirin p = 0.002
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
separated subtype (n)
Separated subtype, n (%) | 8 (25.0%) | 9 (23.7%) | 2 (16.7%) | 8 (18.2%)
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
sulcal effacement (n)
increases, p = 0.031
Sulcal effacement, n (%) | 8 (25.0%) | 3 (7.9%) | 2 (16.7%) | 4 (9.1%) | 0.031*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
trabecular subtype (n)
increases, p = 0.041
Trabecular subtype, n (%) | 9 (28.1%) | 6 (15.8%) | 4 (33.3%) | 6 (13.6%) | 0.041*
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
unilateral hematoma (n)
no effect, p = 0.64
Unilateral hematoma, n (%) | 18 (56.3%) | 26 (68.4%) | 8 (66.7%) | 29 (65.9%) | 0.64
PMID:41765450 · one of two readings recorded this
hemorrhagic recurrence after anticoagulation resumption
pooled event rate 10.95%
After anticoagulation resumption, 73 patients experienced hemorrhagic recurrence, corresponding to a pooled event rate of 10.95%, with nonsignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 40.4%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
hemorrhagic recurrence after anticoagulation resumption
increases, pooled event rate 10.95%
After anticoagulation resumption, 73 patients experienced hemorrhagic recurrence, corresponding to a pooled event rate of 10.95%, with nonsignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 40.4%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke incidence while off anticoagulation after intracranial hemorrhage in mechanical heart valve patients, pooled event rate
increases, pooled event rate 5.23%, 95% CI, 3.80-7.20%
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
While off anticoagulation, 32 patients developed ischemic stroke, with a pooled event rate of 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%) and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke while off anticoagulation, after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with mechanical heart valves, pooled event rate
pooled event rate 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%)
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
While off anticoagulation, 32 patients developed ischemic stroke, with a pooled event rate of 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%) and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke while off anticoagulation
pooled event rate 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%)
While off anticoagulation, 32 patients developed ischemic stroke, with a pooled event rate of 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%) and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke while off anticoagulation
increases, pooled event rate 5.23%, 95% CI, 3.80-7.20%
While off anticoagulation, 32 patients developed ischemic stroke, with a pooled event rate of 5.23% (95% CI, 3.80-7.20%) and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
PMID:41823243 · one of two readings recorded this
30% or greater decline in eGFR (CKD-EPI), doubling of serum creatinine, acute kidney injury (KDIGO), ischemic stroke and systemic embolism; NOACs versus warfarin
NOAC vs warfarin aHR 0.67 for 30% eGFR decline
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
Compared with the warfarin group, the NOAC group was associated with a lower risk of a ≥30% decline in the eGFR, with an aHR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.45–1.00, p = 0.050) after adjusting for all covariates using the doubly robust approach.
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
acute kidney injury, adjusted hazard ratio
no effect, p = 0.169, n = 1456
AKI (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41–1.17, p = 0.169)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, adjusted hazard ratio
decreases, p = 0.026
dabigatran (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16–0.89, p = 0.026)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, adjusted hazard ratio
decreases, p = 0.029
edoxaban (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.89, p = 0.029)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, adjusted hazard ratio
decreases, p = 0.05, n = 1456
the NOAC group was associated with a lower risk of a ≥30% decline in the eGFR, with an aHR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.45–1.00, p = 0.050)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, multivariable logistic regression: age 75 years or older
increases, p = 0.001, n = 1456
age ≥ 75 years (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.28–2.32, p < 0.001)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, multivariable logistic regression: diabetes mellitus
increases, p = 0.002, n = 1456
diabetes mellitus (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18–2.13, p = 0.002)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, multivariable logistic regression: hypertension
increases, p = 0.018, n = 1456
hypertension (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.11–2.99, p = 0.018)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
at least 30% eGFR decline, multivariable logistic regression: NOAC use
decreases, p = 0.014, n = 1456
NOAC use (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.93, p = 0.014)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
doubling of serum creatinine, adjusted hazard ratio
no effect, p = 0.373, n = 1456
doubling of SCr (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.24–1.72, p = 0.373)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
heart failure prevalence at baseline before IPTW
p = 0.002, n = 1456
had a higher prevalence of heart failure (27.1% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.002)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, adjusted hazard ratio
no effect, p = 0.084, n = 1456
aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.22–1.10, p = 0.084
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke and systemic embolism incidence rate
decreases, n = 1456
the incidence rate of ischemic stroke and SEE was 1.87 per 100 person-year and 3.02 per 100 person-year in the NOAC and warfarin group, respectively
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, unadjusted hazard ratio
decreases, p = 0.015, n = 1456
Unadjusted HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24–0.85, p = 0.015
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
male sex at baseline before IPTW
p = 0.009, n = 1456
the NOAC group was more likely to be male (59.7% vs. 53.0%, p = 0.009)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
median body weight at baseline before IPTW
p = 0.001, n = 1456
had higher median body weight (67.5 kg vs. 64 kg, p < 0.001)
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
patients with at least 30% eGFR decline
decreases, n = 1456
a ≥30% decline in the eGFR occurred in 98 and 143 patients who received NOACs (14.1%) and warfarin (18.8%), respectively
PMID:41901613 · one of two readings recorded this
developmental delay on Denver II screening
no effect, p = 0.7, n = 32
Developmental delay on Denver II screening was identified in 2 of 32 children (p = 0.7)
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
growth parameters below the 3rd percentile
no effect, n = 32
No child had growth parameters below the 3rd percentile
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
median age at last follow-up
n = 32
The median age at last follow-up was 61.5 months (range 9-168)
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
minor neonatal echocardiographic findings
n = 32
Minor neonatal echocardiographic findings (e.g., patent ductus arteriosus or patent foramen ovale) were observed in 10 children (31%)
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
overall prematurity rate
n = 32
The overall rate of prematurity was 19%
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
prematurity rate and Denver II developmental delay in children after first-trimester exposure to low-dose warfarin (2.5 or 4 mg/day) plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone
p = 0.6
Not recorded as a finding: a direction is stated and the estimate does not support it
Although higher in children receiving enoxaparin plus warfarin (2.5 mg or 4 mg/day) compared with those receiving enoxaparin alone, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6).
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
prematurity rate in children after first-trimester exposure to low-dose warfarin plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone (abstract only)
prematurity rate higher with enoxaparin plus warfarin than enoxaparin alone, not significant, p = 0.6, n = 32
Not recorded as a finding: a direction is stated and the estimate does not support it
Although higher in children receiving enoxaparin plus warfarin (2.5 mg or 4 mg/day) compared with those receiving enoxaparin alone, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6).
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
prematurity, warfarin plus enoxaparin vs enoxaparin alone
no effect, p = 0.6, n = 32
Although higher in children receiving enoxaparin plus warfarin (2.5 mg or 4 mg/day) compared with those receiving enoxaparin alone, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6)
PMID:41957566 · one of two readings recorded this
mean age of patients with SEH reports
The mean age of patients with SEH reports was notably lower for Warfarin (62 years) compared to the DOACs, where the mean age was 75–76 years
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
proportional reporting ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 25
Apixaban | 0.01 | 66.703 | 25 | 387 | 184,022 | 13,625,800 | 4.55 (3.04–6.82) | 4.78 (3.19–7.17) | 4.78 (3.19–7.17) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
proportional reporting ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 7
Dabigatran | 0.02 | 22.506 | 7 | 405 | 41,400 | 13,768,400 | 5.67 (2.69–12) | 5.75 (2.72–12.1) | 5.75 (2.72–12.1) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
proportional reporting ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 28
Rivaroxaban | 0.02 | 138.495 | 28 | 384 | 123,419 | 13,686,400 | 7.6 (5.18–11.1) | 8.08 (5.51–11.9) | 8.09 (5.51–11.9) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
proportional reporting ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 83
Warfarin | 0.07 | 1777.99 | 83 | 329 | 118,487 | 13,691,300 | 23.5 (18.5–29.7) | 29.1 (22.9–37.1) | 29.2 (22.9–37.1) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
reporting odds ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 25
Apixaban | 0.01 | 66.703 | 25 | 387 | 184,022 | 13,625,800 | 4.55 (3.04–6.82) | 4.78 (3.19–7.17) | 4.78 (3.19–7.17) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
reporting odds ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 7
Dabigatran | 0.02 | 22.506 | 7 | 405 | 41,400 | 13,768,400 | 5.67 (2.69–12) | 5.75 (2.72–12.1) | 5.75 (2.72–12.1) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
reporting odds ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 28
Rivaroxaban | 0.02 | 138.495 | 28 | 384 | 123,419 | 13,686,400 | 7.6 (5.18–11.1) | 8.08 (5.51–11.9) | 8.09 (5.51–11.9) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
reporting odds ratio, spinal epidural hematoma/hemorrhage
increases, n = 83
Warfarin | 0.07 | 1777.99 | 83 | 329 | 118,487 | 13,691,300 | 23.5 (18.5–29.7) | 29.1 (22.9–37.1) | 29.2 (22.9–37.1) | YES
PMID:42062621 · one of two readings recorded this
mean INR change
no effect, p = 0.79, n = 1021
the mean INR value remained unchanged (95% CI, −0.02 to 0.03; p = 0.79)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
mean INR recheck interval change
decreases, p = 0.049, n = 1021
the mean INR recheck interval decreased by 0.7 days (95% CI, −1.4 to 0.0; p = 0.049)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time above therapeutic range change
increases, p = 0.04, n = 1021
time above the therapeutic range increased by 1.3% (95% CI, 0.1 to 2.6; p = 0.04)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time below therapeutic range change
no effect, p = 0.25, n = 1021
Time below the therapeutic range increased by 0.8% (95% CI, −0.5 to 2.1; p = 0.25)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
decreases, p = 0.02
patients aged 75 and older were the only age group with a statistically significant mean TTR decrease of −4.8% (95% CI, −8.9 to −0.8; p = 0.02)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
no effect, p = 0.78
whereas in females it was −0.3% (95% CI, −2.5 to 1.9; p = 0.78)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
decreases, p = 0.01
The mean TTR decrease in males was −3.1% (95% CI, −5.3 to −0.9; p = 0.01)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
decreases, p = 0.01
Non-Hispanic or Latino patients showed a mean decrease in TTR of −2.3% (95% CI, −4.0 to −0.6; p = 0.01
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
decreases, p = 0.02
the mean TTR decrease in White patients was −2.3% (95% CI, −4.1 to −0.4; p = 0.02)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
time in therapeutic range change
decreases, p = 0.01, n = 1021
Following GLP-1 RA initiation, TTR decreased by 2.1% (95% CI, −3.7 to −0.6; p = 0.01)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
within-patient INR standard deviation
no effect, p = 0.051, n = 1021
the within-patient INR standard deviation increased from 0.63 in the pre-index period to 0.66 in the post-index period (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.05; p = 0.051)
PMID:42115581 · one of two readings recorded this
cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction and systemic embolism (high dose groups)
no effect, RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.11, p = 0.58
The pooled risk estimate (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.11; p = 0.58) was close to unity, and the confidence interval spanned 1, indicating no clear superiority over Warfarin.
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction and systemic embolism)
no effect, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.11, p = 0.58
The pooled risk estimate (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.11; p = 0.58) was close to unity, and the confidence interval spanned 1, indicating no clear superiority over Warfarin.
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding (high dose groups)
no effect, RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75–1.04, p = 0.14
The high-dose DOACs demonstrated a non-significant reduction in major bleeding risk compared to warfarin, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75–1.04; p=0.14).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding
no effect
The lack of statistical significance suggests comparable bleeding risks between the two treatments.
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
minor bleeding (high dose groups)
no effect, RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11, p = 0.37
No significant difference was found in minor bleeding rates between high-dose DOACs and warfarin (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11; p=0.37).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
minor bleeding
no effect, RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11, p = 0.37
No significant difference was found in minor bleeding rates between high-dose DOACs and warfarin (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11; p=0.37).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke incidence, pooled risk ratio (high-dose DOACs vs warfarin, randomized controlled trials)
RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
DOACs were favored by the pooled risk ratio of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89; p<0.00001).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke occurrence (high dose groups)
decreases, RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89
DOACs were favored by the pooled risk ratio of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89; p<0.00001).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke occurrence in atrial fibrillation, pooled risk ratio (high-dose DOAC vs warfarin)
decreases, RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
DOACs were favored by the pooled risk ratio of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89; p<0.00001).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
stroke
RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89
DOACs were favored by the pooled risk ratio of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.89; p<0.00001).
PMID:42415975 · one of two readings recorded this
adjusted time in therapeutic range
increases, p = 0.001, n = 5903
Self-testers had higher adjusted time in therapeutic range (TTR; 65.3% vs 59.8%; P < .001)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
adjusted time in therapeutic range
increases, p = 0.0018
Among Black patients, self-testers had higher TTR (58.8% vs 55.4%; P = .0018)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
adjusted time in therapeutic range
increases, p = 0.0001
Among White patients, self-testers had higher adjusted TTR (68.1% vs 61.3%, P < .0001)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
major bleeding rate
decreases, p = 0.014
fewer major (3.4 vs 4.9 per 100 patient-years, P = .014)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
nonmajor bleeding rate
decreases, p = 0.0001, n = 5903
lower nonmajor bleeding rates (20.9 vs 29.9 per 100 patient-years; P < .0001)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
nonmajor bleeding rate
decreases, p = 0.024
fewer nonmajor bleeds (23.1 vs 33.1 per 100 patient-years; P = .024)
PMID:42422772 · one of two readings recorded this
Sources cited
1 paper
- Subject
- warfarin
- Findings
- 1
- Papers
- 1